TOP STORIES

Sunday, 5 August 2012

Sunday, August 05, 2012 Posted by Jake 1 comment Labels: ,
Posted by Jake on Sunday, August 05, 2012 with 1 comment | Labels: ,

PriceWaterhouseCoopers (PwC) contrived a tax avoidance plan, which the Court of Appeal threw out in July 2012. The plan depended on PwC’s client becoming non-resident in the UK by moving to Spain for five years, thereby no longer being liable to Capital Gains Tax in the UK. 

The way the tax plan worked goes something like this: Mr.H., by his commercial astuteness, incurred a taxable capital gain in excess of £10m in the tax year 2002-03. 


To explain in words:
·         On 31st December 2002 H incurs a £10m capital gain that he wants to dodge in the tax year 2002-03. So he consults PwC on how to legally reduce his tax liability.

·         In February 2003, with the end of the tax year approaching, PwC sell him a plan:
o   On 29th March 2003, H moves to Spain. He remains outside the UK for tax purposes for the next 5 years.
o   H enters into four transactions with a bank.
o   On 4th April 2003 two of the transactions are completed resulting in H owing the bank £10m. This is in the tax year 2002-03
o   On 7th April 2003 the remaining two of the transactions are completed resulting in the bank owing H £10m. This is in the tax year 2003-04

·         Overall, Mr H and the bank owe each other the same amount, and so are quits.

·         But Mr.H’s £10m loss is in tax year 2002-03, and so PwC claimed he could write it off against his original £10m capital gain made in December 2002
·         And Mr.H’s £10m gain in tax year 2003-04 is when he was ‘non resident for tax purposes’, and so PwC claimed he was not liable to capital gains tax.

Being "non-resident for tax purposes" doesn't mean giving up pub lunches and grey skies entirely. So long as you aren't in the UK more than 183 days in a tax year, nor for an average of more than 91 days over 4 years, then you are non-resident as far as HMRC is concerned. Which is fine for those who can afford a second home overseas and don't have to turn up to in a UK office or factory every day.

In the end the courts ruled against this. But an accountancy firm as illustrious as PwC thought it was worth a pop plus appeals.

1 comment:

  1. This tax dodge was thrown out by the High Court in July 2012
    http://clients.squareeye.net/uploads/pump/documents/Schofield%20v%20HMRC%20APPROVED%20Judgment.pdf

    PWC, the accountants who promoted this dodge, issued a statement:

    “PwC provides tax advice to a wide range of clients with a wide range of commercial circumstances. That advice is always provided in accordance with the law and with appropriate disclosure to tax authorities.

    “We aim to provide balanced, informed advice which takes into account not only current tax legislation but also current practice and case law."
    http://www.accountingweb.co.uk/article/schofield-decision-sinks-pwc-scheme/529899

    ReplyDelete

Share This

Follow Us

  • Subscribe via Email

Search Us