Legal aid cuts are
forcing domestic abuse victims to be cross-examined by their attackers
The justice system’s treatment of victims of domestic
violence has become a politically charged issue. The Ministry of Justice says
all victims are entitled to legal aid to help them “break free from abusive
relationships”. But according to research by Citizens Advice, victims of
domestic abuse increasingly face being cross-examined by their attackers
because legal aid cuts make it difficult to qualify for courtroom
representation. The report says: “In some cases these restrictions expose
victims to risk, leaving no alternative but to represent themselves in court
facing their perpetrator.” A fifth of Citizens Advice advisers reported that
they could no longer help as many domestic abuse clients as before. A similar
proportion found that most domestic abuse clients were unable to afford the
required contributions when offered legal aid. One major flaw in the system is
that many women cannot access money needed to pay for their contribution,
because they have fled their home and their assets are part-owned by their abuser.
It quotes one victim as saying: “I’ve had to face my violent ex-partner in
court twice now, and will have to continue to do so as I simply cannot afford
costs.” Gillian Guy, the chief executive of Citizens Advice, said: “Domestic
abuse victims must not be a test case for downsizing justice... The
government’s assurance that it will protect access to legal aid for domestic
abuse victims is not standing up”. GUARDIAN
Almost 700,000 people
in UK have zero-hours contract as main job
The rise - 100,000 on a year ago - is likely to trigger
renewed debate over the widespread use of contracts that offer no guarantee of
hours and only those benefits guaranteed by law, such as holiday pay. It represents
2.3% of all people in employment. Overall, because workers often have more than
one job official figures showed the number of individual employment contracts
offering no minimum hours jumped from 1.4m in 2013, to 1.8m last year. The ONS
said the 28% increase was not so much the result of a surge in the number of
zero-hours jobs last year, but due more to staff realising that they were on
these contracts, due to the increased publicity about employment terms. Some of Britain’s largest employers offer zero-hours
contracts to employees. High street giants such as JD Wetherspoon, Burger King,
Domino’s Pizza, Sports Direct and McDonald’s all use the deals. Buckingham
Palace has offered the contracts to staff working in the summer when the
Queen’s main residence is open to the public. The ONS said over half of
businesses in the hotel and catering sectors used the contracts and a quarter
of businesses in education made some use of no-guaranteed-hours contracts in
August 2014. Universities and colleges have become large-scale users of zero-hours
contracts, while an estimated 160,000 care staff are also on similar deals. A
report in the Daily Mail earlier this month found that scores of MPs from all major
parties were found to be offering zero-hours contracts to researchers and other
temporary staff. Based on a series of freedom of information requests, the
newspaper also found several Labour-run councils offering zero-hours contracts.
Around a third of people on them want more hours, the ONS added, saying people
on zero-hours deals are more likely to be women, students in full-time
education or working part-time. They are also more likely to be aged under 25,
or 65 and over. GUARDIAN
Number of new homes
built last year was less than half the figure needed to keep pace with demand
Official figures from the Department for Communities and
Local Government showed that 118,760 homes were completed during the year, an
increase of 8% on the previous year but far below the 250,000 most experts say
are needed to begin to tackle the country’s housing crisis. Quarterly figures
showed the number of new houses started was down by 39% on the peak hit in
March 2007, while completions were down by 26% on the same period. Experts
warned that the failure to build more homes would be “felt for generations to
come” and push house prices further out of reach of aspiring homeowners. Even
before the credit crunch building was failing to keep up with growing demand,
but since then the gap has become bigger. Henry Gregg of the National Housing
Federation said: “With building numbers below half what is needed, we’re
creating a housing shortage that will be felt for generations to come. Every
year the country fails to build enough homes is another year that aspiring
homeowners are priced out, young people are trapped in childhood bedrooms and
families struggle with high rents.” Campbell Robb, chief executive of the
housing charity Shelter, said it was shocking how few homes were being built.
“What’s even more worrying is that the number of new affordable homes started
has fallen dramatically in the last three months,” he said. “Piecemeal schemes
like Help-to-buy are only papering over the cracks. With the general election
around the corner and housing one of voters’ top concerns, it’s time for
politicians to stop just talking about the issue and finally commit to building
the affordable homes we so desperately need.” GUARDIAN
People in need at
risk of losing tax credits after being wrongly accused of cheating
Thousands of people on low incomes are being sent letters by
an American outsourcing company accusing them of cheating on their tax credits
and warning them that they may have their benefits stopped. Concentrix, part of
a multi-billion pound US business services company, has been accused of going
on a vast “fishing expedition” as part of a controversial contract with HM
Revenue and Customs to outsource its fraud and error detection. Staff working
at Concentrix have told The Independent that they are under pressure to open
between 40 and 50 new tax-credit investigations every day and often don’t have
time to check whether the allegations they are making stack up. Meanwhile,
worried claimants have been taking to internet message forums to ask for advice
for dealing with the false allegations being made against them. Many said they
believed the letters to be hoaxes as they asked for personal financial
information such as bank and mortgage statements to be sent to the company
within 30 days. Those who ignore the letters risk having their tax credits
halted. Staff at Concentrix’s office in Belfast, where the contract is based,
have told The Independent that they haven’t been given enough training to
differentiate between genuine claims for tax credits and fraudulent ones. They
also say they are being encouraged to hit a target of making 20 decisions a
day, or about three an hour, on whether to stop, amend or leave a tax claim
unchanged. One worker on Concentrix’s tax-credit contract, who asked not to be
named, said that in his own estimate about six in 10 investigations into people
suspected of not declaring that they’re living with a partner are opened in
error. INDEPENDENT