Posted by Hari on Wednesday, February 01, 2017 with No comments | Labels: Austerity, Big Society, inequality, Osborne, pay, politicians, regulation, Tories
[UPDATED 8/3/17] SOURCE
GUARDIAN: George Osborne to be paid £650,000 for working one day a week
George Osborne has declared a salary of £650,000 a year for
working just four days a month at BlackRock, the world’s biggest fund
management firm, as well as almost £800,000 for speeches to financiers. The
former chancellor’s earnings were revealed in the latest register of MPs’
interests, which shows that he will make more than eight times his salary as a
backbencher as an adviser to the Wall Street firm. He was criticised for taking
the job earlier this year, because BlackRock may have benefited from reforms to
pension rules made while he was chancellor.
SOURCE DAILY MAIL: A shameless ex-Chancellor: the damning extent of Osborne's murky relationship with the Treasury and the finance giant that's just given him a six-figure job
Former Chancellor George Osborne, who is paid £75,000-a-year
to fulfil his duties as an MP, will be working one day a week as an adviser to
the vast American finance firm, BlackRock. This position will add around
£200,000 a year to the household income at the £4million Notting Hill home he
shares with wife Frances and their two young children. It has also reignited
the long-standing, and increasingly furious, public debate about the grubby
‘revolving door’ between government and the private sector. Since Tony Blair
left Downing Street and began lobbying for a mixture of wealthy corporations
and dodgy dictators, it has seemingly become almost automatic for ex-Cabinet
Ministers to cash in by using the experience they gained in office for commercial
gain. This shoddy practice is theoretically regulated by Acoba, a Whitehall
appointments watchdog. Yet in the past eight years, it has not attempted to
stop one single civil servant or politician from taking up a job. Osborne’s new
role at BlackRock was waved through despite the fact that he’d met executives
from the finance giant five times during his last two years at the Treasury. Even
without this latest scandalous twist about BlackRock, which has sparked calls
for a complete revamp of Parliamentary rules, there can be few dethroned senior
politicians who have been quite so shameless and proactive as Osborne in their
pursuit of a fast buck. His dash for cash began a mere four weeks after being
sacked, when he signed up to an American speaking agency called the Washington
Speakers’ Bureau. It represents 602 of what it calls ‘the world’s greatest
minds’ — including those noted intellectuals Tony Blair, Alastair Campbell,
George W. Bush, the former Alaska governor Sarah Palin and the magician David
Blaine — and has already helped Osborne earn £628,000 and counting since he
left the Treasury. Some of the financial institutions that have paid to hear
Osborne’s words of wisdom are, however, a rum old bunch. They include the
aforementioned HSBC, which has paid vast fines in recent years for
money-laundering offences in Mexico and Switzerland, and JP Morgan, which
bunged the former Chancellor £141,752 for two speeches. This is the same JP
Morgan that was last month fined £288 million by European regulators for
interest-rate manipulation. Then there is Citi, who coughed up £85,396 for two
Osborne speeches in November (this week it was hit with a £23 million fine in
the U.S. for mis-treating mortgage holders), and Aberdeen Asset Management,
which spent £51,328 getting him to talk to investors two months ago (and which
not long ago paid a £7.2 million penalty to the Financial Conduct Authority for
failing to properly protect client funds). Most curious of all, however, is a
mysterious organisation called Palmex Derivatives that flew Osborne to New York
in October, where it paid him £80,240.16 for giving a two-hour talk. This
secretive firm — whose operations are said to include financial and insurance
activities, security broking and fund management — has no website, no listed
telephone number or email address and was, until December, registered to a
detached brick home on a cul-de-sac in Southend-on-Sea. Now listed at a service
address in Caterham, Surrey, it has just two directors, a 34-year-old ‘futures
and options broker’ called Robert Palmer and his domestic partner Kirsty Lewis,
who describes her occupation on Companies House documents as ‘home-maker’. In
its last published accounts — up to January 2016 — Palmex listed assets of a
mere £54,598, so hiring the former Chancellor appears to represent a huge
investment for such an apparently small firm. And there is the intimate nature
of the relationship Osborne appears to have forged with his new employer,
BlackRock, while his day-job was running the British economy.
SOURCE BBC NEWS: Working
age families are still £345 poorer than they were before the financial crisis
The average UK household's disposable income - or spending
power - rose by nearly £600 in 2015-16. The typical household had £26,332 to
spend after taxes were paid and benefits received, the Office for National
Statistics (ONS) said. Senior statistician Claudia Wells said: "Household
incomes are above their pre-downturn peak overall, but not everyone is better
off... While retired households' incomes have soared in recent years,
non-retired households still have less money, on average, than before the
crash." The ONS puts growing private pensions ahead of the guaranteed rise
in the state pension - under the so-called triple lock - as the long-term
reason for the pick-up in pensioners' incomes. Household income has tended to
pick up faster over the years owing to an increasing number of couples both in
employment. Matt Whittaker, chief economist at the Resolution Foundation think
tank, said: "Strong employment growth, low inflation and rising pensioner
incomes over recent years have helped drive inequality down to its lowest level
in nearly 30 years... However, the last three years of growth have come back
off the back of a living standards squeeze so deep that typical working age
families are still £345 poorer than they were before the financial crisis. With
employment plateauing, productivity growth refusing to budge and inflation
rising, the risk is that this mini boom won't continue."
OUR RELATED STORIES:
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.