Posted by Hari on Friday, January 23, 2015 with No comments | Labels: budget cuts, jobs, NHS, pharma, public sector, taxation
Fee and KJ pitch Chris with a brilliant idea it seems no one's thought about...
SOURCE GUARDIAN: NHS
will need an extra £65bn by 2030, say analysts
The Health Foundation analysis identifies the sum as the
extra amount of Treasury funding the NHS will need by then because it is
unlikely to meet unrealistically optimistic productivity targets. It says the
NHS will need its budget to rise by 2.9% a year above inflation each year
between 2015-16 and 2030-31 if it is to maintain the standard of services and
avoid having to ration access to treatment. That 2.9% is higher than the
expected 2.3% annual rise over that period in gross domestic product, which means
the government will have to boost NHS spending faster than the economy is
growing. The £65bn will also be needed because the health service is likely to
make only 1.5% annual gains in productivity and not the 2% and 3% envisaged in
the Five Year Forward View, NHS England’s recent blueprint for securing the
service’s uncertain future. The Health Foundation wants whoever forms the next
government to make reaching “a public and political consensus” on the NHS’s
long-term funding needs a priority, and also to give it further additional
money from April as a “transformation fund”, so new ways of delivering
healthcare can be created.
OUR RELATED STORIES:
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.