TOP STORIES
CARTOONS
MAGIC MONEY TREE
POSH GRAMMAR
OSBORNE KERCHING!!
PROMISES PROMISES
SOUTHERN FAIL
DUMB POLLSTERS
DON'T BLAME TRUMP!
£13bn APPLE TAX DODGE
SAFE SEATS = BREXIT?
UKIP v LABOUR
ALL OUT OF IT TOGETHER
EU IMMIGRATION
TORY v TORY
PRISON SUICIDES
LONDON LEAVES UK!
EU v TORY MANDATE
HMRC IS A TAX HAVEN
PANAMA TAX LEAK
IDS v IDS
RICH v POOR
POSH BOYS
HELP2BUY PROFITEERS
LLOYDS, RBS CEO PAY
HSBC DRUG MONEY
PM'S MUM FIGHTS CUTS
PEAK "STUFF" IS HERE
HMRC GOOGLY
PENSION TAX RAID
Showing posts with label Manufacturing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Manufacturing. Show all posts

Thursday, 3 December 2015


SOURCE GUARDIAN: Osborne reliant on rising immigration levels to achieve budget surplus
During last week’s autumn statement, Osborne boasted: “The OBR’s (Office for Budget Responsibility)... forecast today is that the economy will grow robustly every year, living standards will rise every year, and more than a million extra jobs will be created over the next five years.” The chancellor made no reference to immigration in his statement. But analysis of figures from the OBR, the government’s independent forecasting body, shows that Britain’s finances would not be forecast to hit a budget surplus by 2019-20 without recent upward revisions to net migration numbers. As a result of the extra jobs and tax incomes, and changes to the composition of the UK’s working-age population, generated by the influx, the OBR has revised up the level of potential economic output for the UK by 0.9%. Under the OBR’s calculations, if projected net migration had remained unchanged at 105,000 a year, the boost to output would have been negligible. Without the additional output generated by those changed migration forecasts, the projected budget surplus would drop to zero and the only feasible way to achieve one by 2020 would have been through additional spending cuts or tax rises. Furthermore, based on OBR data and the evidence available, it is highly likely that the government’s intention of reducing net migration to the “tens of thousands” is directly at odds with its fiscal target. The OBR’s latest fiscal sustainability report, published in June, stated that net inward migration in line with the Office for National Statistics (ONS) high migration scenario of 225,000 a year would reduce the primary budget deficit by 0.5% of GDP and net debt by 17% of GDP by 2064-65, relative to the OBR’s central projection. In the low migration scenario (105,000 a year), the primary budget deficit would increase by 0.5% of GDP and net debt by 20% of GDP by 2064-65. The OBR’s outlook also shows the 1.1m increase in employment cited by Osborne is mostly because of upward revisions to net migration, which is predominantly concentrated among people of working age: this boosts the employment rate, GDP, potential output and tax receipts. Figures released last week by the ONS show that annualised net migration to Britain hit a new high of 336,000 in June, indicating that further revisions to the OBR’s projections may be in store.

SOURCE FINANCIAL TIMES: Autumn Statement - Osborne accused of resorting to stealth taxes on big businesses, wealthy property owners and council taxpayers
The decision to raise £11.6bn from an apprenticeship levy on businesses came under immediate fire from some tax professionals, who suggested it was at odds with the government’s “triple lock” ban on increasing any of the three main taxes. The levy requires employers to pay an additional 0.5 per cent on their employment costs to fund apprenticeships, which makes it very similar to a rise in employers’ national insurance contributions. Other big increases related to council tax, fuel duty, stamp duty, capital gains tax, corporation tax and pensions tax relief. Council taxpayers will pay an extra £6.2bn by 2021 after the chancellor announced that some local authorities would be allowed to raise council tax faster than previously assumed to meet some of the costs of social care and policing. One of the biggest increases was £3.8bn of higher stamp duty on buy-to-let property and second homes. Another £1.2bn will be raised from property owners by bringing forward payments of capital gains tax on residential property to within 30 days of completion.

Saturday, 15 August 2015


Margaret Thatcher's greatest achievement, according to Margaret Thatcher, was "Tony Blair and New Labour. We forced our opponents to change their minds." 

Two symptoms of this mind-change were:
a) Jeremy Corbyn being the only left-wing candidate nominated for the Labour leadership election in 2015.
b) Jeremy Corbyn's extreme difficulty getting nominated at all by Labour MPs. 

The Guardian newspaper reported that 15 minutes before close of nominations for the leadership election Corbyn was still 3 votes short of the 35 needed to get on the ballot. In the end he scraped in with 4 more last minute nominations. Corbyn admitted some of his nominators only wanted him in the arena to be eaten alive during a full debate with the other three righter-wing candidates. Corbyn said:

"I fully acknowledge and recognise that those colleagues who nominated me – MPs who nominated me – may not necessarily agree with me on the pitch I’m taking or my views on many things...But they also felt there needs to be a full debate on policy in the party"

A former Blair advisor described the 36 MPs who did nominate Corbyn in order to have an inclusive debate as "morons" who needed their "heads felt" and "should be ashamed of themselves". Some of the 36 would probably, with hindsight, agree with him.


So what did Thatcher convert the New Labour mind to? According to the BBC's "What is Thatcherism" article:
"At its most crude, Thatcherism represents a belief in free markets and a small state. Rather than planning and regulating business and people's lives, government's job is to get out of the way."

Thatcher's conversion of New Labour meant the political tug-of-war was reduced to the Tories pulling to the right at one end, and New Labour pushing to the right at the other. Less a tug-of-war, more a sprint for the cookies and orange squash on the benches of power. 

New Labour, during its years in office, edged the government even more out of the way of "business and people's lives". New Labour presided over the chronic decline of the manufacturing industries and enthusiastically pursued the ultimately catastrophic Tory policy of unleashing the finance industry


The illuminating graph below from a report by the Open University and Manchester University, "Rebalancing the Economy (Or Buyer's Remorse)", illustrates the decline of manufacturing in Britain from the rise of Thatcher to the fall of New Labour. Note that Western Europe, and not the low cost countries in the East, was the biggest gainer from the UK's loss:



The report states: 
"the British economy boomed from 2002-07 but there was no cyclical upturn in British manufacturing output as there had been in the general economic recoveries of the late 80s and 90s."

New Labour swallowed the idea that the economy is best left to the private sector, chanting the Tory mantra that business owners becoming 'filthy rich' would, by their benevolence or by the unintended consequences of their selfishness, enrich everybody. The reality was inequality in the UK that had risen rapidly under Thatcher, continued to drift to even greater inequality under Blair and Brown.
http://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/4637
National inequality figures don't expose what happened at a regional level. During the New Labour government London remained the big economic winner. According to a report by the Resolution Foundation's Commission on Living Standards, between 2003-2008 even though UK GDP per head went up by 7% Gross Disposable Income Per Head (money left after expenditure associated with income, for example taxes and social contributions) still fell everywhere except in London, Scotland and Northern Ireland:

The same report shows that the rewards of increasing worker productivity were not reflected in increasing wages for much of the period of the New Labour government. 



Those who say Corbyn would never attract Tory, LibDem and UKIP voters may well be correct. But they miss the point. A more left wing Labour Party, led by Corbyn or whoever, does not need to win power by convincing the Tory or any other party's voters to change to Labour. Labour needs to convince those who don't vote at all, who feel left behind, that Labour offers them something worth voting for. 

Adrian Beecroft, a venture capitalist who advised the previous Tory led coalition, recommended allowing employers to sack workers on a "no fault" basis. Beecroft said this approach would:

“produce an instant improvement in performance in a significant part of the national workforce”.

In plain English, Beecroft reckoned "a significant part of the national workforce" is slacking and could do with a bit more fear to perk them up.


Jeremy Corbyn would have the same effect on British politics. To paraphrase Beecroft, fear of a left wing alternative would produce an instant improvement in the treatment of a significant part of the national workforce. 

Britain needs effective parties on the Left and on the Right. If Labour decides to move Right in order to win elections, then it may gain power but will lose its soul.

His critics say Corbyn lacks the guile required to lead the Labour Party effectively. But will any of the other three more guileful candidates shake off their fixation on doing whatever is needed to achieve power, and achieve power by doing whatever is needed to represent the Left Behind?


Saturday, 22 November 2014

Saturday, November 22, 2014 Posted by Jake 3 comments Labels: , , , , , ,
There has been a lot of talk about fracking the UK. Our government is so keen it has considered changing the law on trespass to make it easier for companies to frack under our properties. 

Would it be a good thing? Even if there is absolutely no risk bits of our green and pleasant land  may disappear down multiple sinkholes?


The graph below from a parliamentary report, "The Impact of Shale Gas on Energy Markets", shows how fracking caused the price of gas to plummet in the USA. Benchmark natural gas prices in the USA (Henry Hub) and the UK (National Base Point (NBP)) were about the same until the Americans got down to some serious fracking.


Saturday, 1 November 2014

Saturday, November 01, 2014 Posted by Jake 4 comments Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,
We Britons are an optimistic bunch. The graph below by Glassdoor, a recruitment company, shows we  consistently believe our work colleagues are much more likely to get fired than we are.


Graph by Glassdoor
Is it this native optimism that encourages politicians to cut public services and rip up safety nets for the unemployed and the disabled? Because we are so confident we ourselves won't need them?

If so, our confidence is sorely misplaced. Office for National Statistics figures show how the UK manufacturing industry collapsed between 1979 and 2013, with 60% of all manufacturing jobs disappearing:

If you are heaving a sigh of relief that you aren't employed in manufacturing, hold that sigh!


Wednesday, 20 August 2014

Wednesday, August 20, 2014 Posted by Hari No comments Labels: , , , ,
Can KJ, Chris and Fee find a silver lining?...

Wednesday, 16 July 2014

Wednesday, July 16, 2014 Posted by Jake 4 comments Labels: , , , , , ,
For years one of the favourite excuses for making all us Ripped-off Britons worse off by hiking prices and keeping down wages has been the need to pay for "investment". 

Energy , telecoms and transport companies warn of blackouts and overcrowding unless we swallow price hikes for "investment". 

Employers and governments say wages and pensions can't go up because the  money kept from us is needed for "investment".


A report by the National Audit Office, "Infrastructure Investment: the impact on consumer bills", reveals the extent of the rampant rises:


"Spending [by consumers paying their bills] on energy and water bills rose by 44 per cent and 21 per cent respectively, in the period 2002 to 2011 while median incomes were still the same in 2011 as they were in 2002 (all figures calculated in 2012 prices)"

And yet when the rain pours, the wind puffs, or the wrong type of snow falls everything seems to grind to a halt. Is all the investment we pay for with higher bills and stagnant wages being wasted? Or is it simply not happening at all?

Figures from a European Union report, "In Depth Review for the UK", suggest that the "investment" is actually woefully inadequate. The report shows that the UK has about the worst investment record of all 27 EU nations.



Makes you wonder where all the  money actually does go:

Friday, 6 June 2014

Friday, June 06, 2014 Posted by Hari 1 comment Labels: , , , , ,
Chris and his professor chum try to work out all the implications...

Thursday, 15 May 2014

Thursday, May 15, 2014 Posted by Jake 1 comment Labels: , , , , ,

File:Tortoise and Scorpion.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tortoise_and_Scorpion.jpg
Pfizer’s pursuit of AstraZeneca brings to mind the old Persian fable of the Scorpion and the Turtle. The Scorpion wanted to cross a lake and asked the Turtle to carry it. The Scorpion promised the Turtle it wouldn’t sting it to death during the voyage because they would both die – Turtle by sting, and Scorpion by drowning. Half way across the Scorpion stung the turtle. As they were both dying, the Turtle asked the Scorpion why it had doomed them both. The Scorpion responded, “I couldn’t help it, it’s in my nature”. Now, there is a difference between Pfizer and the drowning Scorpion: Pfizer can swim.

Appearing before Parliament’s “Business, Innovation and Skills Committee” in May 2014, the Pfizer bosses were pretty open that a key interest in AstraZeneca was the tax advantages. However they, like the Scorpion, promised not to kill off AstraZeneca’s research & development (R&D) in the UK because to do so would harm Pfizer's tax avoidance interests. 

[For your convenience the time of the statement in the video is given in brackets before the quote: see bottom right hand corner of the video for the time] Ian Read, Pfizer CEO, said he would be


(10:49:30) “bringing in manufacturing [to the UK] that wouldn’t have come here without the Patent Box”.

Saturday, 1 February 2014

Saturday, February 01, 2014 Posted by Jake 8 comments Labels: , , , ,
The Tories are a pretty unsavoury bunch. But those who hope for a return to the last Labour government should be careful what they wish for. 


This graph from the Office of National Statistics report "An Examination of Falling Real Wages, 2010 - 2013" offers a startling insight into how Manufacturing jobs withered away under Labour between 2000 and 2010:



The cumulative effect of this has been the loss of one third of manufacturing jobs between 2000 and 2010. Much of this loss happened during the 'boom' years before the banker induced crash. The graph also shows that the vaunted 'boom' in the service industries (from bankers in financial services to waiters in restaurants) was more of a gentle hiss.


Wednesday, 21 August 2013

Wednesday, August 21, 2013 Posted by Jake 7 comments Labels: , , ,
This fascinating graph from a report by the Open University and Manchester University, Rebalancing the Economy (Or Buyer's Remorse), illustrates the decline of manufacturing in Britain:



More interesting than the 24% coming from "low-cost" countries (India, Turkey, Eastern Europe) in 2010, is the 40% coming from "high-cost" Western Europe. It is this 40%, not captured by cheaper labour costs,  that shows Britain's decision to voluntarily withdraw from manufacturing. When banks are in trouble the government pours out limitless rescue money - when manufacturing needs support the public purse is tightly shut. Using goods and services from overseas is an inevitable and generally positive result of globalisation. But, as the report observes: 


"It is of course true that we live in a world in which the manufacturing sectors of all high income countries are increasingly dependent on imported components and assemblies. But in the UK, the propensity to import is much higher, no doubt because of the reliance on foreign owned assemblers operating in global systems: in British machinery and vehicles 50% of intermediate purchases are imported as against just 30% in Germany where the propensity to import is much lower"

For those lefties who want to blame the Tories for the withering of manufacturing, the following graph from the same report exposes the Labour governments dismal record under Tony Blair. As the report states: 

Share This

Follow Us

  • Subscribe via Email

Search Us