TOP STORIES
CARTOONS
MAGIC MONEY TREE
POSH GRAMMAR
OSBORNE KERCHING!!
PROMISES PROMISES
SOUTHERN FAIL
DUMB POLLSTERS
DON'T BLAME TRUMP!
£13bn APPLE TAX DODGE
SAFE SEATS = BREXIT?
UKIP v LABOUR
ALL OUT OF IT TOGETHER
EU IMMIGRATION
TORY v TORY
PRISON SUICIDES
LONDON LEAVES UK!
EU v TORY MANDATE
HMRC IS A TAX HAVEN
PANAMA TAX LEAK
IDS v IDS
RICH v POOR
POSH BOYS
HELP2BUY PROFITEERS
LLOYDS, RBS CEO PAY
HSBC DRUG MONEY
PM'S MUM FIGHTS CUTS
PEAK "STUFF" IS HERE
HMRC GOOGLY
PENSION TAX RAID

Sunday, 14 February 2016

Sunday, February 14, 2016 Posted by Jake No comments Labels: , , , ,
Regulators in Britain, including OFGEM (energy companies) and the FCA (financial companies), are powerless to stop many rip-offs because Parliament has made them that way. 
Regulators have about as much right to stop bad behaviour as a cop has to pull you over for doing 29 mph in a 30 mph zone. You'd need to be shooting at pedestrians with one hand, leaving just your other hand on the steering wheel, for them to do that. Even then, if a British regulator was prosecuting, you wouldn't be done for the civilian casualties but would get a £100 fine for driving while distracted (by shooting at people) as if you were using a mobile phone.

Regulators are impotent because consumer law passed and maintained by successive parliaments, Conservative and Con-Dem and Labour, make it quite legal for traders to rip off the 'less than average' 50% of their customers. This premise forms the bedrock of British commercial culture from banks to pensions to mobile phones to estate agents to broadband packages. The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) even provides a helpful roadmap to guide crooked traders on reaching the below average consumers (our annotations are in red (and this chart really is an OFT roadmap, not us being satirical)):



Energy companies, for example, have traditionally hidden behind hedges to carry out their mischief. These are not the leafy hedges prized by small children with catapults. The hedges the energy companies lurk behind are financial. So what are these financial hedges about?

There are legitimate reasons to take shelter behind a financial hedge. For example, the average refrigerator contains 123 pounds of steel. When a fridge manufacturer publishes a catalogue of prices for the next year, it wants to be sure the cost of the steel it uses doesn't shoot up leaving it making losses on the fridges it sells (or having to randomly hike their prices). The fridge maker can hedge this risk by contracting to buy all the steel up front, but only to be delivered and paid for at various times in the future during the year (a "futures contract"). The steel can be delivered to the fridge factory monthly, just in time for it to be fashioned into that month's quota of fridges.

As a result of the hedging the fridge manufacturer won't suffer if the actual price of steel goes up, but neither will it benefit if the actual price of the steel goes down. It will just pay the price it agreed when it signed up to the futures contract hedge.

Energy companies, who generate and sell electricity and gas to households and industry, can also 'hedge' their purchases of the fuels they use: oil; gas; coal; uranium.

In January 2016 David Cameron complained again about energy companies, scolding them for not cutting their household bills at a time oil prices had plummeted. 18 months before Cameron's passing winge, in June 2014 Mr. Dermot Nolan, CEO of OFGEM, wrote a “letter calling on large energy suppliers to explain the impact of falling wholesale prices on customer bills.”


This resulted in a series of "Dear Dermot" letters. The Big Six consensus being that due to hedging it would be at least 18 months before wholesale prices would have any impact on retail energy bills to households and businesses. Scottish Power stated in its letter:

"Dear Dermot,....
we buy our fuel ahead in order to avoid price shocks from instability in the wholesale markets. This means that movements in wholesale spot markets up or down, are not immediately passed into our cost base: the majority of our energy for 2014 was bought before the start of the year. Unfortunately, the energy we are mainly buying now – for delivery in 2015 and later – is not falling much in price.”


The energy companies thought the drop in oil prices would be temporary. They thought oil prices would surely be back up well within 18 months. In its own Dear Dermot letter, NPower said:
 
"Dear Dermot...
The primary reason for the fall in [wholesale] prices is the exceptionally mild winter we have had" [i.e. the winter of 2013-14].

Low prices caused by the exceptionally mild winter in 2013-14? They never for a moment thought the price would still be low 18 months later, blowing away their 18 month deep smokescreen and ripping off all the 18 veils they were prancing behind.

To better understand what they were talking about, take a look at the graph below of the price of a futures contract to deliver crude oil in January 2016. The price of a barrel of oil delivered to your power station in January 2016 depended on when you bought your futures contract:
  • If you bought the futures contract in 2013 it would have cost around US$95.  
  • If you bought the same contract in mid 2014 it would have cost about US$100. 
  • From mid 2014 the price crashed. 
  • In January 2015 the price was down to US$60. 
  • By the middle of 2015 this futures contract for delivery of oil in January 2016 was down to US$50. For the remainder of 2015 the price continued to fall towards US$40.
https://www.quandl.com/data/ICE/BF2016-Brent-Crude-Futures-January-2016-BF2016

The next graph shows the price of futures contracts for delivery of oil in July 2017.
https://www.quandl.com/data/ICE/BN2017-Brent-Crude-Futures-July-2017-BN2017
With prices so low, the energy companies should be filling their boots with oil futures for as far into the future as possible. They should be promising households and employers much lower energy bills for at least 18 months. Sadly, past experience shows when oil prices go up households and employers will pay more pretty quickly.

Oil prices will go back up. The price can be moved on the whim of a small group of men in countries round the World not subject to shareholders nor democracy nor supply nor demand. Just as energy companies claim to have been stuck with high prices for 18 months after prices crashed, they should also be stuck with low prices for 18 months after the oil price rebounds.

Will our household energy bills stay low for that 18 months? OFGEM did once try to expose the energy companies' shenanigans by publishing wholesale and retail prices. However, they were quickly slapped down, presumably by OFGEM's political masters. The Daily Mail reported in January 2016:
"Power giants have won a secret battle to hide the scale of the profits they are making by refusing to cut prices.

Money Mail can reveal that last April the energy watchdog was bullied into ditching data that show whether households are getting a good deal.

These vital figures used to be published monthly. They showed the difference between what power firms were paying [wholesale] to supply energy to your home and what they were charging you on your bill."


Dear Dermot, OFGEM CEO, responded to the Mail's allegation saying it's not true any secret deal was done. Dermot completely avoided the question of why OFGEM stopped publishing these figures.

History shows that when oil prices go up consumer energy prices go up straight away. But when oil prices go down, even when they collapse, consumer energy prices just trickle down. In February 2016, following the oil price crash 18 months earlier, energy companies reduced prices by a puny 5%.

Whichever way oil goes the energy companies continue business as usual, barely able to stifle their chuckles. They are confident that those who can do something won't, and those who want to do something can't.

Which leaves poor old OFGEM standing impotently by looking to British consumers very much like buffoons.


Thursday, 11 February 2016


SOURCE BBC NEWS: David Cameron's mother signs anti-cuts petition
Mary Cameron, 81, has put her name to a campaign against plans by Conservative-run Oxfordshire County Council to close a number of the centres. Retired magistrate, Mrs Cameron, told the newspaper: "My name is on the petition but I don't want to discuss this any further." She reportedly signed the petition while visiting her son in Oxfordshire. Campaigners are trying to stop the closure of nearly all of Oxfordshire's 44 children's centres - the county council wants to keep eight hubs, to save £8m pounds. The petition describes the proposals as a "false economy", and says the early intervention services provide numerous economic and other long-term benefits. Campaign organiser Jill Huish said she was "not surprised" to have the Prime Minister's mother's endorsement. "It shows how deep austerity is cutting our most vulnerable when even David Cameron's mum has had enough," she said. The prime minister previously wrote to the local authority in his capacity as MP for Witney expressing "disappointment" at planned cuts to museums, libraries and day centres for the elderly. But council leader Ian Hudspeth hit back, saying the cuts were the result of reductions in funding from central government. Members of Unite employed in early intervention by Oxfordshire County Council will walk out on strike on February 16 after voting overwhelmingly for industrial action.

OUR RELATED STORIES:

Tory promises of "Low Tax, High Pay" has given us higher taxes & lower pay. See the stats

Is your Cost of Living crisis over?! Average wages are still back where they were 10 years ago

Graphs at a glance: Budget 2014 document shows we’re growing through borrowing. Again. That's why Britain needs a pay rise


Thursday, February 11, 2016 Posted by Hari No comments Labels:
Bank of England's recovery policies have increased inequality, finds S&P
A study by Standard & Poor’s has found that the low interest rates and quantitative easing used to rescue the economy after the 2008 crash have handed extra wealth to the richest households by propping up stock markets and supporting booming house prices. The report said the wealthiest 10% of households held 56% of all net financial assets in 2008. By 2014 the proportion of the nation’s wealth in the hands of this group had risen to 65%. Without government policies to restrict house price rises and promote greater equality, the report said the situation would only get worse. The finding in the report – “QE And Economic Inequality: The U.K. Experience – is likely to wound policymakers in Threadneedle Street who have repeatedly rebutted criticism that the Bank’s policies favoured the rich over the poor. “While unconventional monetary policy measures such as QE proved successful in restoring confidence and supporting the economic recovery, an unintended consequence has been to exacerbate wealth disparity between rich and poor,” said Tatiana Lysenko, senior economist at S&P. Under the QE programme, the Bank of England has spent £375bn buying government bonds from the banking sector to encourage investment in riskier assets. Officials hoped investors would direct investments into new technologies and assets that improved productivity. But most of the money has been invested in shares and property. Home ownership will likely drop in the coming decades, said the report, perpetuating high income and wealth inequality far into the future. GUARDIAN

Right To Buy puts 40% of ex-council homes in private rental, with higher rents - MPs' report
Forty per cent of ex-council flats sold through right to buy are being rented out more expensively by private landlords, the Commons communities and local government select committee has found. It also found that in some areas councils could be forced to sell up to 97% of properties upon vacancy. MPs expressed concern that the discount applied to starter homes could make them an attractive investment for those who can already afford to buy a home, as after five years owners will be allowed to sell at full market value. The true affordability of starter homes was also questioned. Lord Kerslake told the committee: “I think it is hard in London to see a property that requires a salary of £77,000 and a deposit of £90,000 as really meeting the definition of affordable.” Prioritising starter homes over affordable rent also has the potential to affect affordable housing levels, the committee stated, as housebuilders will seek to build homes with the highest possible returns. The committee called on the government to release annual statistics on how many new homes are built by each local authority, how many are sold under right to buy, and their tenure. Senior figures in the social housing sector have been critical of the decision to cut social rents by 1% a year, which will cost housing associations a lot of money. David Montague, chief executive of housing association L&Q, told the committee: “For L&Q, the annual loss by year four is almost £60m... For g15 [a group of London’s 15 largest housing associations], the annual loss by year four is £500m; for the sector, we estimate that the annual loss is £1.6bn. Imagine what we could have done with that money if we had borrowed against it. That is a lot of homes. We have lost a very significant amount.” GUARDIAN

Doctors training as specialists at all-time low, leaked figures show
Doctors’ leaders have described the figures as “very bad for the NHS”, especially as it is already struggling with shortages of key medical personnel in a number of areas, such as general practice and A&E. Figures compiled by Health Education England (HEE), the NHS’s medical training and education body, show that the number of Foundation Year 2 (F2) doctors who have applied to start training as a specialist in a branch of medicine next August in the NHS has fallen to just 15,855. That is 1,251 fewer than in 2013 – a 7.9% drop – and 453 fewer than the 16,308 who applied last year, a 2.8% decrease. The number of F2 doctors seeking to become family doctors has fallen particularly sharply. Only 4,863 such medics have applied to train as GPs from this August – 25% fewer than the 6,447 who did so as recently as 2013. That raises further questions about David Cameron and Hunt’s repeated pledge to increase the number of GPs in England by 5,000 by 2020. “To see such a large number of doctors junior considering their options and even leaving the NHS in the early stages of their careers is incredibly worrying,” said Dr Johann Malawana, the chair of the BMA’s junior doctors’ committee. “This will only worsen the recruitment crisis we are already seeing in many parts of the health service. GUARDIAN

David Cameron's mother signs anti-cuts petition
Mary Cameron, 81, has put her name to a campaign against plans by Conservative-run Oxfordshire County Council to close a number of the centres. Retired magistrate, Mrs Cameron, told the newspaper: "My name is on the petition but I don't want to discuss this any further." She reportedly signed the petition while visiting her son in Oxfordshire. Campaigners are trying to stop the closure of nearly all of Oxfordshire's 44 children's centres - the county council wants to keep eight hubs, to save £8m pounds. The petition describes the proposals as a "false economy", and says the early intervention services provide numerous economic and other long-term benefits. Campaign organiser Jill Huish said she was "not surprised" to have the Prime Minister's mother's endorsement. "It shows how deep austerity is cutting our most vulnerable when even David Cameron's mum has had enough," she said. The prime minister previously wrote to the local authority in his capacity as MP for Witney expressing "disappointment" at planned cuts to museums, libraries and day centres for the elderly. But council leader Ian Hudspeth hit back, saying the cuts were the result of reductions in funding from central government. Members of Unite employed in early intervention by Oxfordshire County Council will walk out on strike on February 16 after voting overwhelmingly for industrial action. BBC NEWS

Tory MP, on £74k a year, moves back in with his PARENTS because he can't afford deposit on a London house
William Wragg, 28, says he is part of the 'clipped wing generation' of graduates who are forced to go home to save a deposit. Mr Wragg, a former primary school teacher elected in 2015 to Hazel Grove, Greater Manchester, says the punishing cost of renting has left him without enough cash to buy a house. The Tory was born in Stockport, where he lives with mother Julie, 54, and father Peter, 55, in their suburban semi-detached home. A quarter of all adults aged between 20 and 34 in the UK - around 2.8milllion people - are still living with their parents. 'I'm extremely well paid, don't get me wrong. It is not wage related but I do need a few years at home to save a deposit... I know exactly what it is like. I have complete empathy with people in that position,” he said. Critics say his situation will embarrass his own party because it highlights the lack of affordable housing and high rents in the UK. The new MP is paid three times more than the average £26,000-a-year UK salary and can claim expenses for a constituency office and rent for a second home, either in London or his constituency. But politicians must always pay for their main home themselves after MPs fiddled their expenses by 'flipping' properties bankrolled by the taxpayer. DAILY MAIL

Payday lenders hit by changing views, Church says
A "sea change in public and political opinion" about payday lenders has brought falls in use of these loans, a Church taskforce has concluded. The report highlighted that payday lending had fallen by 68% from 2013. Archbishop Justin Welby created the taskforce, led by former regulator Sir Hector Sants, to promote responsible credit and savings which, after two years of work, has now published its final report. Since 2013 the membership of credit unions had grown by 13%, with 123,000 new members in Britain. The taskforce's report highlighted work to create a credit union for Church staff, financial advice in churches, and savings clubs in schools. "Although there are many other influences beside the Church, the Archbishop of Canterbury's intervention has undoubtedly helped to galvanise broader awareness of, and support for, credit unions from churches and wider society and contributed to a sea change in public and political opinion around payday lending," the report said. In 2013, the Archbishop of Canterbury told online lender Wonga that the Church would try to force it out of business by helping credit unions. But it emerged that the Church of England had indirectly invested £75,000 in the company. The Church ended its ties with Wonga in 2014. BBC NEWS

Growing teacher shortages as Government misses recruitment targets
Despite spending £700 million a year on recruiting and training new teachers, the Government has missed its recruitment targets for the last four years, according to a new report from the National Audit Office (NAO). Between 2011 and 2014 the number of teachers leaving the profession increased by 11 per cent. Secondary schoolteacher training places were the hardest to fill, with 14 out of 17 secondary subjects with unfilled training places in 2015/16 compared with just two subjects with unfilled places in 2010/11. Furthermore, there has been a rise in the number of classes being taught in secondary schools by teachers without a relevant post-A-level qualification. Citing physics as an example, the NAO revealed that the proportion of classes taught by a teacher without a qualification in the subject rose from 21 per cent to 28 per cent in the four years to 2014. The report accused the Department of Education (DfE) of having a "weak understanding of the extent of local teacher supply shortages" with particular problems in disadvantaged areas of the country. TELEGRAPH

US fashion giant Gap embroiled in British tax bill row
The multinational retailer, which trades on its wholesome West Coast image, has paid almost no corporation tax — once rebates are taken into account — since 2011 despite sales of more than £1 billion, according to a new analysis of its “opaque” accounts. Gap, founded in San Francisco in 1969, is one of the most familiar presences on the high street with 132 stores and turnover of more than  £300 million a year. It also owns Banana Republic, which has eight UK outlets. However, accounts reveal the three British-based Gap companies made net losses between 2012 and last year — allowing the world’s third biggest fashion retailer to reclaim more than £4.2 million from the taxman and set it against future profits. The accounts suggest Gap has been shuffling profits between the businesses and to the parent company in San Francisco. This strategy, although entirely legal, has reduced its potential liability to HM Revenue and Customs. The disclosures will add to pressure on Chancellor George Osborne to close loopholes that allow vast corporations to pay virtually no tax in Britain despite having huge sales. It follows the huge row last month after it emerged that Google has struck a “sweetheart” deal with British tax authorities to pay £130 million in back taxes covering 10 years. Starbucks was found to be paying a fee to itself in the Netherlands which avoided making a profit in Britain, while buying coffee beans via a Swiss subsidiary. EVENING STANDARD

EU proposals will force multinationals to disclose tax arrangements
US multinationals such as Google, Facebook and Amazon will be forced to publicly disclose their earnings and tax bills in Europe, under legislation being drafted by the EU executive. The European commission is to table legislation in early April aimed at making the world’s largest multinational corporations open their tax arrangements with EU governments to full public scrutiny. According to three senior EU officials familiar with the proposals, initial conclusions from an ongoing impact assessment have found in favour of obliging large corporations to reveal their profits and the tax they pay in every country in which they operate within the EU. Public country-by-country reporting is seen as important because without it large companies are more able to make secretive deals with governments on where and how they declare their profits. The commission was heavily criticised last month when it proposed that corporations report only to national tax authorities in Europe without making the information public. But there have been some successes. The competition commissioner, Margrethe Vestager, has already found Starbucks in the Netherlands and Fiat in Luxembourg culpable of tax avoidance and ordered them to pay €30m (£23m) each in unpaid taxes. Last month she also ordered 35 multinationals in Belgium to pay €700m in dodged taxes. Similar investigations are ongoing into Apple in Ireland and Amazon in Luxembourg. GUARDIAN

French law forbids food waste by supermarkets
France has become the first country in the world to ban supermarkets from throwing away or destroying unsold food, forcing them instead to donate it to charities and food banks. Under a law passed unanimously by the French senate, large shops will no longer bin good quality food approaching its best-before date. Charities will be able to give out millions more free meals each year to people struggling to afford to eat. The law follows a grassroots campaign in France by shoppers, anti-poverty campaigners and those opposed to food waste. The campaign, which led to a petition, was started by the councillor Arash Derambarsh. In December a bill on the issue passed through the national assembly, having been introduced by the former food industry minister Guillaume Garot. Campaigners now hope to persuade the EU to adopt similar legislation across member states. The law has been welcomed by food banks, which will now begin the task of finding the extra volunteers, lorries, warehouse and fridge space to deal with an increase in donations from shops and food companies. In recent years, growing numbers of families, students, unemployed and homeless people in France have been foraging in supermarket bins at night to feed themselves. People have been finding edible products thrown out just as their best-before dates approached. Carrefour, France’s biggest supermarket group, said it welcomed the law, which would build on food donations its supermarkets already made. Of the 7.1m tonnes of food wasted in France annually, 67% is binned by consumers, 15% by restaurants and 11% by shops. Each year 1.3bn tonnes of food are wasted worldwide. A report published in 2015 showed that UK households threw away 7m tonnes of food in 2012, enough to fill London’s Wembley stadium nine times over. Avoidable household food waste in the UK is associated with 17m tonnes of CO2 emissions annually. GUARDIAN

Friday, 5 February 2016

Friday, February 05, 2016 Posted by Hari No comments Labels: , , , , ,
KJ and Fee doubt it...
SOURCE GUARDIAN: If having more no longer satisfies us, perhaps we’ve reached ‘peak stuff’
The economy pumps out goods and services, all of which create jobs and incomes. There is no value judgment in such a statement, no view of what constitutes the good life. Even to invite such a question of an economist is to risk ridicule. The task of economists – a value-free quasi-science – is to make sure that as little as possible gets in the way of turning inputs into more outputs. But around the developed world consumers seem to be losing their appetite for more. Even goods for which there once seemed insatiable demand seem to be losing their lustre. Last week, mighty Apple reported that in the last three months of 2015 global sales of the iPhone stagnated, while sales of iPads tumbled from 21m units in 2014 to 16m in the same three months of 2015. In the more prosaic parts of the economy – from cars to home furnishings – there are other warnings that demand is saturated. At a Guardian Sustainable Business debate, Steve Howard, head of Ikea’s sustainability unit, declared: “In the west, we have probably hit peak stuff. We talk about peak oil. I’d say we’ve hit peak red meat, peak sugar, peak stuff… peak home furnishings.” The average western consumers’ home is bulging with all the materials and goods it needs, runs the line. Suddenly, whether more is always the answer is being questioned, not by environmental thinktanks, but by the market. Only in developing countries have consumers the capacity to want more, but as Howard accepted, for that they need buying power, which in turn rests on the global distribution of income and wealth being fairer.



Thursday, 4 February 2016

Thursday, February 04, 2016 Posted by Hari No comments Labels:
Wealthy Tory council publicly warns David Cameron his cuts are 'unrealistic'
East Sussex County Council, a Tory stronghold since its creation, said the Government’s fiscal policy would “significantly reduce the quality of life for many people in East Sussex”. The letter to the PM was signed by Councillor Keith Glazier, who leads the council, and the leaders of the other political party groups in East Sussex: Labour, Liberal Democrat and Ukip group leaders on the council, as well as the leader of the area’s independents group. “The fact that leaders of all parties have put their names to this letter shows that this is an issue which transcends politics,” Mr Glazier said. The local authority has cut more than £78 million since 2010 but has to make further savings of up to £90 million by April 2019, including £40 million from its adult social care budget. This is despite a plan to increase council tax by 3.99 per cent raising £4.7m, the maximum allowed by the Government without holding a costly local referendum. Last November Mr Cameron came to blows with his own local Tory council, Oxfordshire County Council. The Prime Minister was accused of not understanding the impact of his own policies on local services when he claimed the council should be making “back-office savings” and protecting frontline services. Both East Sussex and Oxfordshire’s budget situation comes despite being two of the more wealthy county council in the UK. INDEPENDENT

London's black-cab drivers claim 'Four cabbies pay more tax than Uber'
London’s black-cab drivers are considering court action to try to revoke Uber’s licence to operate in the city, citing the fact that the ride-hailing app firm pays no corporation tax in the UK. It emerged last October that Uber paid just £22,134 in UK corporation tax in the most recent financial year despite making an £866,000 profit. The tax paid related to amounts deferred from previous years when Uber’s UK operation made a loss. An Uber spokesperson said: “The comparisons being made with other companies are misplaced. They are profitable and have been for years. Uber is younger and still investing heavily... We make a loss and corporation taxes are paid on profits not revenues.” John Christensen, co-founder of the Tax Justice Network, said there could be some profit-shifting in the case of Uber that had reduced the group’s UK profits. The firm was able to pay such a low sum partly because it legally transfers profits generated within the UK to its sister company in the Netherlands, where it would be liable for a lower rate of tax. GUARDIAN

Think Help to Buy London will get your first home in the capital? You might need to earn £73k a year
The government’s Help to Buy London helps buyers of new-build homes get onto the property ladder with a deposit of as little as 5 per cent. It tops their deposits up with an interest-free loan of up to 40 per cent of the price of a property. It is available for properties costing up to £600,000 but property listing website Zoopla claims that the average London home costs almost £40,000 more than this - leaving hopeful buyers needing large salaries even if they take on the maximum help available. To buy a £600,000 home - the maximum price under the scheme - a buyer would need to be earning a 'substantial' salary of £73,000, according to Zoopla. It is double the average London salary of £35,000. Their 5 per cent deposit of £30,000 would be topped up with a Government interest-free loan for 40 per cent of the price - the equivalent of £240,000. That would leave them needing to borrow a mortgage of £330,000 - and based on an income multiple of four times wages they would need a £73,000 salary to get that. For a lower purchase price of £350,000, buyers would still need a higher than average salary of £43,000 for a mortgage of £192,500, according to Zoopla. Help to Buy London's deposit assistance doubles that of the original Help to Buy, which provides a 20 per cent interest-free loan for new-build properties. The London scheme offers a bigger loan due to the higher price of property in the capital. The Help to Buy Equity Loan scheme was first introduced by the Government in April 2013 and has been extended until 2021. DAILY MAIL

Universal Credit leaves working families worse off, IFS says
Universal Credit (UC), which combines six benefits into one monthly payment, was intended to be more generous than the current system but the IFS said cuts to the programme meant this would not be the case. But it said UC would encourage people into work and save £2.7bn a year. According to the IFS research, an estimated 2.1 million families will face an average loss of £1,600 a year, while 1.8 million will gain an average of £1,500. Its figures suggest 1.1 million homes with no-one in paid work will lose out by about £2,300 a year, while 500,000 are expected to gain £1,000. Working single parents are said to face an annual loss of £1,000. The new payments system still only affects a minority of claimants, but it is gradually being rolled out across the country. The government has always said that Universal Credit (UC) would encourage more people to find work. The IFS said that was true for most people, but not all. It said that single parents, for example, had less of an incentive to work under UC than under the old system. Where couples are concerned, UC encourages just one of them to find employment, rather than both, the IFS claimed. The government has always said that no individuals will lose money as a result of the changes. New claimants for UC will also be helped by transitional support. BBC NEWS

Bus services being wiped out in England and Wales by cuts
Councils are reducing expenditure on buses by more than £27m over the coming years as a result of government funding being slashed by £78m since 2010, says a study by the Campaign for Better Transport (CBT). The cuts are on a par with the controversial Beeching plans of the 1960s to scale down the rail network, according to the report. People living in Lincolnshire, Derbyshire, Somerset, Dorset, west Berkshire, Wiltshire, Oxfordshire, Hertfordshire, North Yorkshire and Lancashire would be worse affected, the CBT found. Martin Abrams, CBT’s public transport campaigner, said it was a “bitter irony” that many of the bus routes being cut had originally replaced the thousands of rail services Beeching had marked for the chop, leaving more areas without any public transport. Peter Box, the Local Government Association’s transport spokesman, said councils were finding it impossible to keep making up a funding shortfall for the concessionary fares scheme, which is in place for young, elderly and disabled people. He added: “The way the concessionary travel scheme is funded by Whitehall has long been unfit for purpose and has not kept up with growing demand and cost. Unless the government commits to fully funding concessionary fares, vital bus services that support the most vulnerable in our society will continue to come under pressure.” GUARDIAN

Age UK’s promotion of energy deals with E.On to be examined by regulators
The Sun claimed that Age UK recommended a special rate from E.On which would typically cost pensioners £1,049 for the year - £245 more than its cheapest rate in 2015. It also alleged that Age UK received about £41 from energy supplier E.On for every person signed up. Age UK's accounts indeed show that it received £6.3m in income from energy deals in the year to April 2015. But the charity said the commission was typically only £10 per customer. The charity said its two year fixed tariff was the cheapest deal on offer when it launched in January. It said customers were free to choose the one-year option, but many preferred the reassurance of a two-year tariff. The energy regulator Ofgem and the Charities Commission are to examine the deals. BBC NEWS

EU watchdog considers action against "closet" tracker funds
Investors, both consumers and pension fund managers, have long suspected some of the funds that charge them higher fees to scour the market for the best picks may in reality be "closet" trackers that simply mimic the performance of stock indexes. Actively managed funds charge fees that are multiples of those charged by tracker funds. After calls in 2014 from EU investor lobby group Better Finance, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) studied a sample of 2,600 funds over 2012-2014. The watchdog said it had found that 5 percent to 15 percent of UCITS equity funds could potentially be closet index trackers. It is the latest blow to the asset management sector where regulators are also scrutinising fees at a time cash-strapped governments want people to save more for their retirement. UCITS (Undertakings for the Collective Investment in Transferable Securities) are EU regulated funds touted by Europe as the "gold standard" of mutual funds globally. There are 29,000 UCITS holding 9 trillion euros ($9.8 trillion). Academics have said an actively managed fund should be at least 60 percent different from an index to be genuinely active, and inserting a requirement to disclose the active share metric could be one option for ESMA. REUTERS

Thursday, 28 January 2016

Thursday, January 28, 2016 Posted by Hari No comments Labels: , , ,

SOURCE GUARDIAN: Google expected to reveal growth of offshore cash funds to $43bn
Google is poised to confirm next week that controversial tax structures in Ireland, the Netherlands and Bermuda have boosted its offshore cash mountain to more than $43bn (£30bn), figures from financial analysts suggest. Despite governments around the world promising to crack down on the tech company’s tax avoidance arrangements, Wall Street analysts are confident Google will continue to salt away profits in Bermuda for years to come. Alphabet, Google’s parent company, will report its 2015 earnings next week and is expected confirm that offshore cash funds have grown by about $4bn in just 12 months. Offshore reserves of $43bn, held largely through Bermuda, represent profits from markets outside the US. Of these markets, the UK is the largest, accounting for 17% of non-US sales. But latest published accounts show Google’s UK subsidiary paid just £21m in tax for 2013. Google’s tax structure means income from many major overseas markets – including £4.56bn from the UK – is booked through Ireland. Much of it is then bounced through the Netherlands and back to Ireland and Bermuda. These strategies are known in tax jargon as the “Double Irish” and the “Dutch Sandwich”. Two years ago, George Osborne promised to bring an end the “extraordinary lengths … some technology companies go to to pay little or no tax [in Britain]”, introducing a tax on diverted profits last year. Last week, however, Google reached a long-awaited settlement with HRMC – in which it agreed to pay £130m in back taxes and bear a greater tax burden in future – that effectively sanctioned its continued use of Irish companies to book UK sales. Only a small increase in UK tax must now be paid by Google’s British arm.

SOURCE ITV NEWS: Intimate waxing? Worst tax return expense claims revealed
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) has revealed the top five most outrageous personal expenses claims included in last year’s Self Assessment tax returns. The expenses range from furnishing a new flat to the cost of storing Mars bars overnight in a fridge. Here’s the full list of bizarre expenses that some taxpayers have tried, and failed, to claim for:
  • The costs for storing Mars bars overnight in a fridge
  • The cost of a pair of flip flops so I don’t have to walk barefoot between my work’s changing and shower rooms
  • The costs for my intimate waxing
  • I bought a second hand car to get me from home to work so I didn’t have to walk
  • I purchased my own flat, so I need to claim back the money I spent on the furniture.
Ruth Owen, HMRC Director General Of Personal Tax, said: “There are a number of items and expenses that people can claim against, such as genuine business costs and items needed to do a job. But a painful beauty regime or the furniture for your own home are not items that every taxpayer in the country should be contributing towards. It’s wrong that a small minority of people expect the honest majority to subsidise their lifestyle and HMRC will never allow for these to be processed as genuine claims.”


OUR RELATED STORIES:


Thursday, January 28, 2016 Posted by Hari No comments Labels:
Secret deal with regulator OFGEM that lets greedy energy firms hide their obscene profits
Power giants have won a secret battle to hide the scale of the profits they are making by refusing to cut prices. Last April the energy watchdog was bullied into ditching data that show whether households are getting a good deal. These vital figures used to be published monthly. They showed the difference between what power firms were paying to supply energy to your home and what they were charging you on your bill. It was a rough guide to the size of the profits they were likely to make. In the last month before these figures were scrapped, the Big Six energy companies were shown to be charging 9 per cent more than it cost them to provide gas and electricity to households.  This translated into £120 profit per customer, according to regulator Ofgem. But the information was quietly removed. Since then it has been impossible for households to know whether providers are making a fair return.  This is because in the past nine months power firms have benefited hugely as the price of oil has crashed by 54 per cent to a 13-year low of $30 a barrel. In turn, this has slashed the cost of supplying energy to British homes. But the greedy firms have failed to pass on these savings to customers. Just three of the major firms have cut gas prices since April — and by no more than 5.1 per cent. And electricity prices have not budged in two years. In yet another sign that the Big Six are charging too much, smaller companies are using falling oil prices to launch ever-cheaper dual-fuel tariffs. The result is a ballooning gap between the rip-off charges at giant providers and the cheapest deals on the market. We found families can save £405 by switching supplier — a record amount. Providers say they are making less money this year because of the warm winter and have kept prices high to compensate. But experts suspect they are boosting profits while sitting on piles of your cash. And after a major crackdown on the industry was delayed for months,  the energy giants have been left free to profiteer. DAILY MAIL

Tax Dodge: Google expected to reveal growth of offshore cash funds to $43bn
Google is poised to confirm next week that controversial tax structures in Ireland, the Netherlands and Bermuda have boosted its offshore cash mountain to more than $43bn (£30bn), figures from financial analysts suggest. Despite governments around the world promising to crack down on the tech company’s tax avoidance arrangements, Wall Street analysts are confident Google will continue to salt away profits in Bermuda for years to come. Alphabet, Google’s parent company, will report its 2015 earnings next week and is expected confirm that offshore cash funds have grown by about $4bn in just 12 months. Offshore reserves of $43bn, held largely through Bermuda, represent profits from markets outside the US. Of these markets, the UK is the largest, accounting for 17% of non-US sales. But latest published accounts show Google’s UK subsidiary paid just £21m in tax for 2013. Google’s tax structure means income from many major overseas markets – including £4.56bn from the UK – is booked through Ireland. Much of it is then bounced through the Netherlands and back to Ireland and Bermuda. These strategies are known in tax jargon as the “Double Irish” and the “Dutch Sandwich”. Two years ago, George Osborne promised to bring an end the “extraordinary lengths … some technology companies go to to pay little or no tax [in Britain]”, introducing a tax on diverted profits last year. Last week, however, Google reached a long-awaited settlement with HRMC – in which it agreed to pay £130m in back taxes and bear a greater tax burden in future – that effectively sanctioned its continued use of Irish companies to book UK sales. Only a small increase in UK tax must now be paid by Google’s British arm. GUARDIAN

Tesco knowingly delayed payments to suppliers, with sometimes millions of pounds unpaid for years
The Grocery Code Adjudicator, Christine Tacon, said the supermarket seriously breached the industry's code of conduct to protect grocery suppliers. Tesco apologised for the practices, saying they had harmed its suppliers. Tesco remains under investigation by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) into alleged accounting irregularities. The grocery ombudsman's investigation began in February 2015 following the revelation of an accounting scandal at Tesco. In September 2014 a £250m black hole was found in the company's accounts - a sum later revised up to £326m - because of the way Tesco booked income from its suppliers. Ms Tacon said: "I received internal Tesco emails which encouraged Tesco staff to seek agreement from suppliers to the deferral of payments due to them in order to temporarily help Tesco margins... I also saw internal Tesco emails suggesting that payments should not be made to suppliers before a certain date in order to avoid underperformance against a forecasted margin." Ms Tacon's investigation found that even when a debt had been acknowledged by Tesco, on occasions the money was not paid for more than 12 months, with some amounts taking two years to be repaid, the investigation found. One example involved a supplier owed a multi-million pound sum as a result of price changes being incorrectly applied to Tesco systems over a long period. This was eventually paid back by Tesco more than two years after the incorrect charging had begun. Ms Tacon cannot fine Tesco as she only acquired the power to fine companies after the Tesco investigation began. BBC NEWS

New pension taxes are £5bn/year 'milch cow' for chancellor, says IFS head
George Osborne is using pension taxes as a “milch cow” to pay off the deficit, the head of the Institute of Fiscal Studies has said. The chancellor is expected to announce the results of a Treasury inquiry into tax on pensions in the budget on 16 March. Among the changes being considered is the replacement of variable tax relief on pension contributions with a single, flat-rate of between 25% and 33%, which would cause high earners to lose some of their rebates. Paul Johnson, director of the leading independent thinktank the IFS, said: “The tax regime has been changed and changed again as pension savings have proved something of a milch cow for the current chancellor. “By reducing the amount that can be put in a pension free of tax in any one year and the maximum size of the accumulated pot, he has increased tax revenues by more than £5bn a year.” Johnson said changes to pensions tax relief could cause “the implicit contract at the heart of our pension system [to] buckle under the pressure... Governments of all stripes have recognised that widespread access to good private pensions is an essential part of the implicit deal with the voter — we won’t pay you much of a state pension, but we will make sure you have the chance to save for yourself,” wrote Johnson in the Times. “And at the heart of that deal has been the tax treatment of private pensions. It should go without saying that nobody would tie up hundreds of thousands of pounds in a pension, which they can’t access for decades, if there weren’t some benefit for doing so compared to saving in some other way. That benefit is tax relief.” Former Conservative leadership hopeful David Davis told the Times that such a move would deter people from providing a full state pension for themselves. “It’s problematic because the pension industry used to be the jewel in the economic crown when it comes to having a population looking after themselves.” GUARDIAN

NHS staff cuts: Number of mental health nurses falls 10%
Figures from the NHS’s health and social care information centre, obtained through a parliamentary question, show that the number of qualified nurses working in psychiatry dropped by 10.8% from 41,320 in 2010 to 36,870 in 2015. The figures raise questions about the funding of mental health services, whether NHS workforce planning is delivering enough of the staff needed and the former coalition government’s repeated pledge to introduce “parity of esteem” in the NHS treatment received by patients with mental health problems compared to those with physical ailments.
The sudden drop comes at time when more and more people are seeking mental health treatment from the NHS. Official figures show that the number of people in contact with NHS mental health services has surged by as much as 40% over the same period. Other RCN research from earlier this month, showing that London hospitals had 10,000 nursing vacancies, found that NHS mental health trusts were among those worst affected by the shortage of nurses. The South London and Maudsley trust, England’s largest specialist provider of mental health care, has 440 vacant nursing posts, representing more than one in four (26%) of its total complement of nurses. Similarly, the West London mental health trust is short of 242 nurses – 22% of its headcount. Meanwhile, student nurse bursaries are being abolished as part of the Department of Health’s (DH) plan to boost NHS England’s budget by £8bn by 2020-21 by cutting the budgets of non-frontline NHS organisations such as Health Education England (HEE), which looks after staff training and education, and Public Health England. Forcing would-be nurses to take out student loans will save £650m a year from HEE’s budget by 2018-19 and ultimately £1.2bn a year by 2020-21. GUARDIAN

Appeal court rules bedroom tax discriminatory in two cases
The bedroom tax has been declared unlawful by the appeal court due to its impact on vulnerable individuals, dealing a significant blow to the work and pensions secretary, Iain Duncan Smith. Judges ruled that in two cases – those of a victim of extreme domestic violence and grandparents of a severely disabled teenager – the government’s policy amounted to unlawful discrimination. The first case involved A, a single mother living in a three-bedroom council house fitted with a secure panic room to protect her from a violent ex-partner. The other was brought by Paul and Sue Rutherford, grandparents of Warren, who is seriously disabled child and who needs overnight care in a specially adapted room. In both cases, the claimants faced a cut in housing benefit because they were deemed to be “under-occupying” the additional rooms which were classified as spare. A government spokesman said: “We know there will be people who need extra support. That is why we are giving local authorities over £870m in extra funding over the next five years to help ensure people in difficult situations like these don’t lose out.” But the ruling heaps pressure on the government over the bedroom tax, which the Labour party has vowed to abolish. A DWP evaluation of the policy published last month found that it it was not meeting its key aim of freeing up larger council properties Just one in nine affected tenants were able to avoid the tax by moving to a smaller property. GUARDIAN

G4S paid to look after empty beds at scandal-hit Medway youth jail
The security firm G4S is being paid for looking after empty beds in a secure training centre (STC) that is the focus of allegations of widespread abuse by staff, the Guardian has learned. The company has received over £260,000 since the abuse story broke. The Youth Justice Board (YJB), which oversees the detention of young people in England and Wales, said that 47 children are detained at Medway STC in Kent. But G4S is being paid to look after the full capacity of 76. Following the allegations, the YJB announced it would stop sending children to Medway. Earlier this month, a BBC Panorama investigation revealed footage, taken by an undercover reporter working as a guard at Medway, in which children were being assaulted by staff, who later boasted about the abuse to colleagues. Staff were also seen talking freely about falsifying records of violent incidents. Under STC rules, if more than two children are fighting, it is classified as staff losing control of the centre and G4S faces heavy fines. Footage showed a guard saying: “If we get an incident with four kids, it will get split up so they, G4S, don’t get fined.” G4S runs England’s three STCs – Medway, Oakhill in Milton Keynes and Rainsbrook in Northamptonshire. But following a damning inspection report last year, the contract to run Rainsbrook was taken away, although the company is in place until May when MTCnovo will take over. The inspection at Rainsbrook found children had been subjected to degrading treatment and racist comments from staff. Six members of staff were dismissed. In 2014, 14 children who had been unlawfully restrained in STCs run by G4S and Serco were awarded damages amounting to £100,000. Neither company admitted liability but paid two-thirds of the damages. The remaining third was paid by the YJB. GUARDIAN

Friday, 22 January 2016

Friday, January 22, 2016 Posted by Hari 2 comments Labels: , , , ,
KJ, Chris and Fee come to terms with it all...

SOURCE GUARDIAN: Pension taxes are 'milch cow' for chancellor, says IFS head
George Osborne is using pension taxes as a “milch cow” to pay off the deficit, the head of the Institute for Fiscal Studies has said. The chancellor is expected to announce the results of a Treasury inquiry into tax on pensions in the budget on 16 March. Among the changes being considered is the replacement of variable tax relief on pension contributions with a single, flat-rate of between 25% and 33%, which would cause high earners to lose some of their rebates. Paul Johnson, director of the leading independent thinktank the IFS, said: “The tax regime has been changed and changed again as pension savings have proved something of a milch cow for the current chancellor. “By reducing the amount that can be put in a pension free of tax in any one year and the maximum size of the accumulated pot, he has increased tax revenues by more than £5bn a year.” Johnson said changes to pensions tax relief could cause “the implicit contract at the heart of our pension system [to] buckle under the pressure”. “Governments of all stripes have recognised that widespread access to good private pensions is an essential part of the implicit deal with the voter — we won’t pay you much of a state pension, but we will make sure you have the chance to save for yourself,” wrote Johnson in the Times. “And at the heart of that deal has been the tax treatment of private pensions. It should go without saying that nobody would tie up hundreds of thousands of pounds in a pension, which they can’t access for decades, if there weren’t some benefit for doing so compared to saving in some other way. That benefit is tax relief.” Former Conservative leadership hopeful David Davis told the Times that such a move would deter people from providing a full state pension for themselves. “It’s problematic because the pension industry used to be the jewel in the economic crown when it comes to having a population looking after themselves.”

OUR RELATED STORIES:

Tory promises of "Low Tax, High Pay" has given us higher taxes & lower pay. See the stats

Is your Cost of Living crisis over?! Average wages are still back where they were 10 years ago

Graphs at a glance: Budget 2014 document shows we’re growing through borrowing. Again. That's why Britain needs a pay rise


Share This

Follow Us

  • Subscribe via Email

Search Us